Nutritional value of oat (Avena sativa) forage with different fertilization treatments
Keywords:
forage, nutritional value, organic fertilization, TurquoiseAbstract
Oats (Avena sativa) is a grass cultivated as fodder for cattle feed. The objective of this work was to evaluate the nutritional value of turquoise oat forage variety with different fertilization treatments. Planting was carried out in the experimental field of the Tecnológico Nacional de México campus Valle del Guadiana in Ejido Villa Montemorelos, Durango in January 2021. Four fertilization treatments were evaluated: Control (without fertilization), Chemical, Tea of manure and NB Soil (commercial organic fertilizer). The ash content (CEN), crude protein (PC), ethereal extract (EE), crude fiber (FC), nitrogen-free extract (ELN), neutral detergent fiber (FDN), acid detergent fiber (FDA) and lignin (L). A completely randomized design with three repetitions and a comparison of means with Tukey's test (?=0.05) was used. Significant differences were found only for EE, PC and L between treatments. Both in the EE and in the PC the chemical treatment presented the highest values (3.86 % and 5.84 %, respectively) while for L the NB Soil treatment registered the highest value (12.48 %). The nutritional value of oat forage is not negatively affected by the application of unconventional fertilizers, and may be an option for its use in this type of crop.
e2026-1.
https://doi.org/10.21929/abanicoboletin/2026.5
References
AGANGA A, Omphile AUJ, Thema T, Wilson LZ. 2004. Chemical composition of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) at different stages of growth and ryegrass silages with additives. J. Biol. Sci. 4: 645-549. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2004.645.649
ANKOM. Acid detergent fiber in feeds. Filter bag technique (ANKOM200). Ankom Technology 2005; www.ankom.com/09_ procedures/ADF%20Method%20A200.pdf (verified 8 Jan. 2008). Macedon, NY, USA: Ankom Technology Corp. Accessed Jun 28, 2016. https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_5_ADF_A200.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOopLn6KSrqDKa01p2jjYryIXt7t_oC-qXsyGfW90nvu2b-FmtkXA
AOAC. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. https://worldveg.tind.io/record/10653
INFOAGRO. Información del Sistema Agropecuario. 2010. Cultivo de avena. Información agronómica. InfoAgro Systems. Madrid, España. www. infoagro. https://infoagro.com/herbaceos/cereales/avena.htm
INFOSIAP (Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera). 2022. Anuario estadístico de la producción agrícola. http:// infosiap.siap.gob.mx/aagricola_siap_gb/icultivo/index.jsp
FEYISSA F, Tolera A, Melaku S. 2007. Effects of variety and growth stage on proportion of different morphological fractions in oats (Avena sativa L.). Degefa T, Feyyissa F editors. Proc 15th Ann Conf Ethiopian Soc Anim Prod (ESAP), Ethiopia. Pp. 47-61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263037232_Proportions_of_morphological_fractions_of_oats_Avena_sativa_L_as_affected_by_variety_and_growth_stage
RAMÍREZ-ORDÓÑES S, Domínguez-Díaz D, Salmerón-Zamora JJ, Villalobos-Villalobos G, Ortega-Gutiérrez JA. 2013. Producción y calidad del forraje de variedades de avena en función del sistema de siembra y de la etapa de madurez al corte. Revista fitotecnia mexicana. 36(4):395-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2013.4.395
TAMAYO AG, Franco M, Hincapié JE, Rodríguez. 2007. Abonamiento orgánico del cultivo de la estevia en Colombia. Suelos Ecuatoriales. 37(2):155-159. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://repositorio.unc.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.14074/1815/2%20TESIS%20STEVIA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
VILLASEÑOR M, Espitia HE, Huerta RE, Osorio EJ, López HJ. 2009. Turquesa, nueva variedad de avena para la producción de grano y forraje en México. Agricultura Técnica en México. 35(4):480-485. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=60812274015
VILLASEÑOR-MIR HE, Huerta-Espino J, Rodríguez-García MF, Santa-Rosa RH, Espitia-Rangel E, Martínez-Cruz E. 2021. Mejoramiento genético de avena en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. Publicación especial 25:21-25. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i25.2808
VAN-SOEST PJ. 1965. Symposium of factors influencing the voluntary intake of herbage by ruminants: voluntary intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 24:834-843. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=901ff740-6ed8-438d-9346-d10bbb0b80b4
ZAMORA VVM, Lozano RAJ, López BA, Reyes VMH, Díaz SH, Martínez RJM, Fuentes RJM. 2002. Clasificación de triticales forrajeros por rendimiento de metería seca y calidad nutritiva en dos Localidades de Coahuila. Téc. Pec. Méx. 40:229-242. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26619080_Clasificacion_de_triticales_forrajeros_por_rendimiento_de_materia_seca_y_calidad_nutritiva_en_dos_localidades_de_Coahuila
Published
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
